🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 304+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(304 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$40
$66.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck. No chips or cracks.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy shipment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck

Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck. No chips or cracks.

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1468923

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Glasses

Original Price:$66.67 USD

Sale Price:$40 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 304 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure this Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck!
The Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck arrived in terrific condition.
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified
1 week ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
Exactly What I Needed
In daily use, the Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck works as described and it meets expectations.
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified
1 month ago

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five Stars for Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck
From my experience, the Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck works fine and it meets expectations.
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous Value for Money
The Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck arrived quickly enough.
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified
1 week ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading Purchase Ever
For the price, the Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck performs as expected so it’s acceptable.