🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 707+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

ideal Sport F/S Tights

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(707 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$89
$148.33
Sale
βœ“ no-cost shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

LightweightSuper-stretchSilicone full seat gripper dotsSide pocketsNylon/Spandex material

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy shipment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

superb Sport F/S Tights

  • Lightweight
  • Super-stretch
  • Silicone full seat gripper dots
  • Side pockets
  • Nylon/Spandex material


This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1324940

Category: Women > CLOTHING > Socks & Hosiery

Original Price:$148.33 USD

Sale Price:$89 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5575 reviews
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extraordinary ideal Sport F/S Tights
The ideal Sport F/S Tights arrived neatly packaged.
27 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkably pleased
Personally, the flawless Sport F/S Tights feels okay and I don’t regret it.
49 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
fabulous quality
I’ve had no issues with the outstanding Sport F/S Tights.
29 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 day ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
impeccable purchase
The outstanding Sport F/S Tights has been working fine since arrival.
2 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superior
The superb Sport F/S Tights looks basic, but functionally it’s fine.
48 people found this helpful